Odds are you’re probably on Facebook. And if you’re anything like me, you’ve probably also squashed requests to play FarmVille like they were aphids under your thumb. If you’re not like me, you may be one of the 80 million people playing this popular Facebook farming game every month.

Why are people flocking to tend virtual sheep when so many real farmers are virtually barely scraping by? Social media blog Mashable sees how the two measure up when planted side-by-side:

Your support powers solutions-focused climate reporting — keeping it free for everyone. All donations DOUBLED for a limited time. Give now in under 45 seconds.
Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

Stories like this don’t tell themselves.

Make others like it possible. Your support powers solutions-focused climate reporting — keeping it free for everyone. Give now in under 45 seconds.
Secure · Tax deductible · Takes 45 Seconds

FarmVille vs. Real Farms graphicGraphic: Shane Snow

See the rest of the graphic here at Mashable.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

The differences are stark. Few of the top crops grown on FarmVille (such as strawberries and peas) overlap with what’s actually most planted the world over (maize, oil palm fruit, etc.).

I think the most interesting discrepancy, however, is the gender difference: 60 percent of FarmVille tenders are female vs. 13 percent of real farmers. Does this portend some repressed desire of middle-aged females to participate in the food system? Or are they just really bored?

[Full disclosure: While in high school, I hoed more than a few virtual rows myself in the very similar Nintendo game, Harvest Moon. But hey! I now have my own large edible container garden, and at least one dedicated FarmVille player has been inspired to start his own tomato garden planted firmly in reality.]