"approved" stampAfter all the fuss, after the flurry of debate (some of which occurred right here on Grist), S. 510 — the Food Safety Modernization Act — has passed the Senate, by a margin of nearly 3-to-1. That’s a rare level of consensus in this polarized age.

As for me, I am ambivalently happy about the outcome. I described my reservations about these new turns in food-safety policy here.

Now the legislation heads back to the House, which passed its version of a food-safety bill back in 2009. The House’s version is considered tougher on the food industry. For example, the House bill would have companies chip in a fee to offset part of the cost of increased inspection, while the Senate bill gives them a free ride on that front. (Food and Water Watch’s Elanor Starmer has a handy rundown of the House bill.)

Grist relies on the support of generous readers like you. Donate today to keep our climate news free.

So what happens now? The Hill reports:

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

The two versions could be reconciled in conference talks, but time is running out. The lame-duck session has a full agenda, including the debate on extending the Bush-era tax cuts; the passage of a budget or a continuing resolution in order to keep the government funded; and a vote on the defense authorization bill, which includes a provision to repeal “Don’t ask, don’t tell.”

If food-safety reconciliation gets lost in the shuffle of those headline-grabbing topics and the House fails to get to it in the lame-duck session, then the bill will collapse. The new Congress would have to start from scratch. That would likely deal a death blow to food-safety reform prospects for the foreseeable future.

That’s why advocates are hoping that the House takes the quickest path to passing the bill: simply voting yea or nay on the Senate version, which is precisely how health-care reform passed last spring.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.