State Department picked less-than-objective company to review Keystone XL impact
Sometimes you wish government bureaucrats would just stop and think. It's been clear for a while now that the State Department favors the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. But one would think that they'd like to at least preserve the appearance that they were conducting a thorough and unbiased review of the pipeline’s environmental impacts.
Apparently that wasn't a particular concern, because the department allowed TransCanada, the pipeline operator, to participate in the selection of the company conducting the environmental review. Perhaps less than surprisingly, Transcanada recommended Cardno Entrix, which considers TransCanada a "major client," to do the job.
Now maybe the pipeline really will have "limited adverse environmental affects," as Cardno Entrix reported. But is anyone really inclined to believe them, knowing that they've gotten scads of business from TransCanada?