Here is the state of politics surrounding action on climate change.

Earlier today, ExxonMobil once again announced its support for a carbon tax. Per Bloomberg:

Exxon Mobil Corp. is part of a growing coalition backing a carbon tax as an alternative to costly regulation, giving newfound prominence to an idea once anathema in Washington. …

Reader support makes our work possible. Donate today to keep our climate news free. All donations TRIPLED!

“Combined with further advances in energy efficiency and new technologies spurred by market innovation, a well-designed carbon tax could play a significant role in addressing the challenge of rising emissions,” Kimberly Brasington, a spokeswoman for the company, said in an e-mail. “A carbon tax should be made revenue neutral via tax offsets in other areas,” she added.

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Exxon’s political action committee gave nearly $1.2 million to political candidates in the past two years, 93 percent of it to Republicans, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

neubie“Please tax this.” – ExxonMobil.

So that’s the view of ExxonMobil, a company that makes money indirectly generating carbon dioxide pollution. And now, that of the president of the United States, a member of the Democratic Party.

The White House pool report quotes press secretary Jay Carney:

Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Q: I’m just speaking of the aftermath yesterday — he seemed to almost go out of his way to dismiss the idea of a carbon tax, kind of rule it out. Why did he — why was he so —

MR. CARNEY: We would never propose a carbon tax, and have no intention of proposing one.

For those of you inclined to give President Obama the benefit of the doubt after his press conference yesterday — go ahead and doubt.

If it’s any consolation, a carbon tax was never going to happen anyway. (It’s no consolation.)